focus on
-
Average read time 6'

Sick leave and workplace absence: employee rights, duties, and potential risks

Published in: Employment law
by Debora Teruggia
Home > Sick leave and workplace absence: employee rights, duties, and potential risks

Under Italian labor law, illness is a legitimate reason for employee absence, but only if managed correctly. Timely communication, valid medical certification, and compliance with availability hours are essential conditions for maintaining entitlement to benefits and avoiding disciplinary sanctions. In this article, we analyze what employees can (and cannot) do while on sick leave, which behaviors are considered unlawful, and how to defend oneself in case of disciplinary action. A practical guide to avoiding formal mistakes and protecting your rights.

Sick leave and employee obligations

When an employee is absent due to illness, they are entitled to a substitute allowance in place of their regular salary, as provided for by Italian Legislative Decree No. 151/2001. The sick leave period is intended for the psychophysical recovery of the employee, who is expected to follow the physician’s instructions, resting and receiving proper care.

However, to avoid losing the allowance and prevent disciplinary action, the employee must fulfill the following essential obligations:

  • Promptly notify the employer of the absence, preferably in writing;
  • Provide a medical certificate, including the protocol number of the electronically transmitted document. Alternatively, it can be delivered in paper format within two days of issue. This is the only official document that certifies temporary incapacity to work.

In practice, managing illness is often more complex. For example, what happens if the employee cannot immediately obtain the medical certificate? In such cases, the first days of absence may not be recognized. Some physicians, if they consider the patient’s claim to be medically credible, may backdate the illness start date to the day prior to the visit. Otherwise, the employee must justify the delay with additional documentation, such as an emergency room report.

Another issue arises when illness extends beyond the initial prognosis. In this case, a new medical certificate is required. If the physician fails to submit it promptly, this may create an administrative gap that interrupts INPS coverage and may result in sanctions.

Lastly, if the employee feels recovered before the end of the certified period and returns to work without an updated certificate, the employer may legitimately refuse to allow the return. Early reinstatement is only permitted after the certificate has been revised accordingly.

These examples show that managing illness requires attention and awareness. But what happens if the employee is found away from home during sick leave?

Employee’s obligation to be available

In addition to notifying the employer and providing medical certification, the employee must remain available at the declared address during the designated hours for medical check-ups. If illness occurs while the employee is traveling or on vacation, the alternative address must be communicated to both INPS and the employer immediately.

This is not a mere formality: it is a duty to cooperate with oversight bodies such as the employer or INPS. The employee is expected to facilitate medical inspections—failing to do so may result in loss of benefits and disciplinary measures.

Being unavailable during the visit, failing to communicate a change of address, or refusing a medical examination are serious violations, not simple oversights, and may compromise both financial entitlements and trust in the employment relationship.

For more on this topic, we recommend reading: Medical check-ups and the obligation to be available: what happens if the employee is not at home.

What can (and can’t) employees do while on sick leave?

Being on sick leave does not necessarily mean staying in bed all day—but neither does it grant unlimited freedom. The employee’s behavior, even outside of availability hours, must be consistent with their declared health condition.

According to established Italian Supreme Court case law (e.g., Cass. civ., Labor Section, No. 21667/2017; Cass. civ., Order No. 26496/2018), an employee on sick leave must not:

  • engage in activities that cast doubt on the existence of the illness;
  • delay or hinder recovery;
  • jeopardize their return to work.

For instance:

  • In ruling No. 24812/2016, the Court upheld the dismissal of a worker on sick leave for carpal tunnel syndrome who was found working as a gelato vendor;
  • In Order No. 23852/2024, a similar decision was made regarding a worker caught playing football while on leave;
  • In decision No. 17113/2016, lifting heavy objects by an employee with back pain justified a termination for cause.

However, there are exceptions. In the recent ruling No. 30722/2024, the Court ruled in favor of a worker suffering from anxiety, who was seen singing in a piano bar. The Court held that such activity did not hinder recovery and might even promote mental well-being.

The guiding principle is that each case must be assessed individually, considering the illness and the employee’s actual job duties. Even outside availability hours, behavior must be compatible with the diagnosed condition.

In cases of suspicion, employers may hire private investigators. Their findings—so-called defensive checks—can be used to initiate disciplinary proceedings, including dismissal.

What are the risks, and how can the employee defend themselves?

Poor management of sick leave can result in anything from warnings to termination for cause. Common violations include:

  • late submission of the medical certificate;
  • unjustified absence during a medical check-up;
  • engaging in incompatible activities.

The first step is to carefully analyze the disciplinary notice. Every word matters: the employer must clearly state the alleged facts and the violated rules. A superficial reading may undermine the employee’s ability to defend themselves.

Next, the validity of the accusations must be verified:

  • Was the certificate truly submitted late?
  • Were there valid technical or medical reasons?
  • If the check-up was missed, can the absence be justified?

If the employee is accused of incompatible activity, does it actually jeopardize recovery or returning to work?

At this stage, it’s essential to gather all supporting documents, as emails, receipts, updated medical records, communications with the doctor or employer—everything that demonstrates good faith and the absence of intentional wrongdoing or negligence.

Additionally, attention must be paid to deadlines: the employee generally has five days to respond (per Article 7 of the Italian Workers’ Statute). A well-structured, clear, and well-documented defense can make the difference between a simple warning and a dismissal.

This is why the support of a labor law attorney is highly recommended. Every disciplinary dispute should be handled with care. Rash or incomplete replies may result in serious consequences.

For further insight into what tools employers have to manage unjustified absences—and the impact these may have on employees—see our article: New “automatic resignation” procedures for unjustified absences.

© Canella Camaiora Sta. All rights reserved.
Publication date: 22 April 2025

Textual reproduction of the article is permitted, even for commercial purposes, within the limit of 15% of its entirety, provided that the source is clearly indicated. In the case of online reproduction, a link to the original article must be included. Unauthorised reproduction or paraphrasing without indication of source will be prosecuted.
error: Content is protected !!